<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Oil, Oil, Everywhere, But Not A Drop To Refine</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.draveed.com/?feed=rss2&#038;p=535" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.draveed.com/?p=535</link>
	<description>The place I think out loud</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 06 Jul 2008 03:17:31 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: draveed</title>
		<link>http://www.draveed.com/?p=535&#038;cpage=1#comment-4497</link>
		<dc:creator>draveed</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Jun 2008 23:55:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.draveed.com/?p=535#comment-4497</guid>
		<description>Well Mike, I&#039;m VERY glad to hear there is some progress on building a new refinery. 2010 is kinda far, but hey, at least it&#039;s something. Thanks for the good news.

Simon, the enviromentalists certainly aren&#039;t helping; that&#039;s for sure. I don&#039;t get why people won&#039;t question how it&#039;s perfectly fine to drill for oil in the Gulf of Mexico, but it&#039;s somehow evil and wrong to drill along the Atlantic or Pacific coasts. 

Why is there even a choice here? Why can&#039;t oil companies drill along the coasts AND also pursue alternative sources of energy? That&#039;s something for everyone and provides our future with some insurance. What if these new energy sources don&#039;t pan out? We&#039;ll research them for 10 or 20 years and be left with nothing to show for it? At least if we allow drilling today, we have a familiar energy source to fall back on in case things don&#039;t turn out as expected.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well Mike, I&#8217;m VERY glad to hear there is some progress on building a new refinery. 2010 is kinda far, but hey, at least it&#8217;s something. Thanks for the good news.</p>
<p>Simon, the enviromentalists certainly aren&#8217;t helping; that&#8217;s for sure. I don&#8217;t get why people won&#8217;t question how it&#8217;s perfectly fine to drill for oil in the Gulf of Mexico, but it&#8217;s somehow evil and wrong to drill along the Atlantic or Pacific coasts. </p>
<p>Why is there even a choice here? Why can&#8217;t oil companies drill along the coasts AND also pursue alternative sources of energy? That&#8217;s something for everyone and provides our future with some insurance. What if these new energy sources don&#8217;t pan out? We&#8217;ll research them for 10 or 20 years and be left with nothing to show for it? At least if we allow drilling today, we have a familiar energy source to fall back on in case things don&#8217;t turn out as expected.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: M. Simon</title>
		<link>http://www.draveed.com/?p=535&#038;cpage=1#comment-4494</link>
		<dc:creator>M. Simon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Jun 2008 11:39:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.draveed.com/?p=535#comment-4494</guid>
		<description>So you have to ask yourself: Is it possible that the enviros are the cause of the oil war?

&lt;a href=&quot;http://powerandcontrol.blogspot.com/2008/05/this-is-stickup.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;No Blood For Oil or No Drilling For Oil?&lt;/a&gt;

===

I think their days (Democrat/Enviro alliance) are numbered. Just as the Dems are no longer so close to the anti-gun crowd.  Backing losers is a losing proposition.

The Ds are not going to do near as well in Nov. as they believe.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So you have to ask yourself: Is it possible that the enviros are the cause of the oil war?</p>
<p><a href="http://powerandcontrol.blogspot.com/2008/05/this-is-stickup.html" rel="nofollow">No Blood For Oil or No Drilling For Oil?</a></p>
<p>===</p>
<p>I think their days (Democrat/Enviro alliance) are numbered. Just as the Dems are no longer so close to the anti-gun crowd.  Backing losers is a losing proposition.</p>
<p>The Ds are not going to do near as well in Nov. as they believe.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike</title>
		<link>http://www.draveed.com/?p=535&#038;cpage=1#comment-4491</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Jun 2008 14:58:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.draveed.com/?p=535#comment-4491</guid>
		<description>We may eventually see a new refinery in the U.S. in a few years.  South Dakota voters approved rezoning for a planned refinery.  It will process Canadian crude.  Construction is scheduled to begin in 2010.  Better late than never.

&lt;a&gt;&lt;i&gt;S.D. county approves rezoning for new oil refinery&lt;/i&gt;&lt;/a&gt;

Also, see &lt;a&gt;&lt;i&gt;Crude Rising Faster Than Gasoline&lt;/i&gt;&lt;/a&gt;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We may eventually see a new refinery in the U.S. in a few years.  South Dakota voters approved rezoning for a planned refinery.  It will process Canadian crude.  Construction is scheduled to begin in 2010.  Better late than never.</p>
<p><a><i>S.D. county approves rezoning for new oil refinery</i></a></p>
<p>Also, see <a><i>Crude Rising Faster Than Gasoline</i></a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
